Vol X
| EDITORIAL | ||
| 1. | Constitutional Court Review Beyond the Global Pandemic David Bilchitz |
III |
| LEAD ESSAYS | ||
| 2. | The Constitutional Court’s 2018 Term: Lawfare or Window on the Struggle for Democratic Social Transformation? Theunis Roux, University of New South Wales |
1 |
| 3. | Judicial Appointments in India: From Pillar to Post Arghya Sengupta, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, & Jay Vinayak Ojha, Independent |
43 |
| SYMPOSIUM: REFUGEE LAW | ||
| 4. | Access to Effective Refugee Protection in South Africa: Legislative Commitment, Policy Realities, Judicial Rectifications? Ruvi Ziegler, University of Reading |
65 |
| 5. | No Return to Persecution or Danger: Judicial Application of the Principle of Non-Refoulement in Refugee Law in South Africa and Malawi Redson Edward Kapindu, High Court of Malawi |
107 |
| SYMPOSIUM: INTERNATIONAL LAW | ||
| 6. | The Constitutional Court’s Judgment in the SADC Tribunal Case: International Law Continues to Befuddle Dire Tladi, University of Pretoria |
129 |
| 7. | We Are All International Lawyers; Now What? Taking Seriously the Constitutional Injunction to Integrate International Law Obligations into South African Law Andreas Coutsoudis & Max du Plessis, University of KwaZulu-Natal |
155 |
| 8. | International Law, Access to Courts and Non-Retrogression: Law Society v President of the Republic of South Africa Sanya Samtani, University of Oxford |
197 |
| ARTICLES | ||
| 9. | South Africa’s Doctrinal Decline on the Right to Protest: Notification Requirements and the Shift from Fundamental Right to National Security Threat Jane Duncan, University of Johannesburg |
227 |
| 10. | What’s So Wrong with Quotas? An Argument for the Permissibility of Quotas under s 9(2) of the South African Constitution Nomfundo Ramalekana, University of Oxford |
251 |
| 11. | Sexual Harassment and Disciplinary Procedures: Never the Twain Shall Meet Bonita Meyersfeld, University of the Witwatersrand |
301 |
| 12. | The Constitutional Court on the Rights of Minority Trade Unions in a Majoritarian Collective Bargaining System Stefan van Eck & Kamalesh Newaj, University of Pretoria |
331 |
| 13. | ‘Swartman’: Racial Descriptor or Racial Slur? Rustenburg Platinum Mine v SAEWA obo Bester [2018] ZACC 13; 2018 (5) SA 78 (CC) Joanna Botha, Nelson Mandela University |
353 |
| 14. | Where Is Property? Some Thoughts on the Theoretical Implications of Daniels v Scribante Zsa-Zsa Boggenpoel & Bradley Slade, Stellenbosch University |
379 |
| 15. | The Problems with Prince: A Critical Analysis of Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Prince Nabeelah Mia, South African Institute for Advanced Constitutional, Public, Human Rights and International Law |
401 |
Vol IX
| THE RULE OF LAW, THE SEPARATION OF POWERS & ANTI-CORRUPTION EFFORTS | ||
| 1. | Pushing the Boundaries: Judicial Review of Legislative Procedures in South Africa Stephen Gardbaum, University of California |
1 |
| 2. | A Tactical Separation of Powers Doctrine Aziz Z Huq, University of Chicago |
19 |
| 3. | Precautionary Constitutionalism, Representative Democracy and Political Corruption Firoz Cachalia, University of the Witwatersrand |
45 |
| CRIME AND PUNISHMENT | ||
| 4. | Plea Bargaining in South Africa: An Economic Perspective Richard Adelstein, Wesleyan University |
81 |
| 5. | Reconciliation as the Aim of a Criminal Trial: Ubuntu’s Implications for Sentencing Thaddeus Metz, University of Johannesburg |
113 |
| LAND REFORM, HOUSING & THE SPATIAL EMBEDDEDNESS OF APARTHEID | ||
| 6. | Unpacking Section 25: What, If Any, are the Legal Barriers to Transformative Land Reform? Jackie Dugard, University of the Witwatersrand |
135 |
| 7. | From Housing to City: On the Possibilities of the Right to the City in South Africa and India Ajey Sangai, O.P. Jindal Global University |
161 |
| 8. | Dismantling Apartheid Geography: The Limits of the Law Ralph F Madlalate, Harvard University |
195 |
| THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STRUCTURE & CONTENT IN CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS | ||
| 9. | A Service Conception of the Constitution: Authority, Justification, and the Rule of Law in Proportionality Analysis Richard Stacey, University of Toronto |
219 |
| 10. | Forcing the Court’s Remedial Hand: Non-Compliance as a Catalyst for Remedial Innovation Helen Taylor, University of Oxford |
247 |
| 11. | Invalid Court Orders Mitchell Nold de Beer, Cape Bar |
283 |
| AB, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS & CHILDREN’S RIGHTS | ||
| 12. | Surrogacy, Geneticism and Equality: The Case of AB v Minister of Social Development Denise Meyerson, Macquarie University |
313 |
| 13. | The Constitution as an Instrument of Prejudice: A Critique of AB v Minister of Social Development Donrich Thaldar, University of KwaZulu-Natal |
343 |
| 14. | The Best Interests of the Child and the Constitutional Court Meda Couzens, University of KwaZulu-Natal |
363 |
| THE LIMITED INFLUENCE OF AFRICAN MORAL THEORY & LAW ON THE CONSTITUTION | ||
| 15. | Kindred Strangers: Why has the Constitutional Court of South Africa Never Cited the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights? Tom Gerald Daly, University of Melbourne |
387 |
| 16. | Human Dignity in the Common Law of Contract: Making Sense of the Barkhuizen, Bredenkamp and Botha Trilogy Hanri Du Plessis, University of South Africa |
409 |
| THINGS WE DON’T LIKE TO TALK ABOUT | ||
| 17. | The More Things Change: Multiracialism in Contemporary South Africa Martin Brassey, University of the Witwatersrand |
443 |
| 18. | The Silent Right: Environmental Rights in the Constitutional Court of South Africa Ruth Krüger, University of the Witwatersrand |
473 |
| 19. | Judicial Independence and the Office of the Chief Justice C H Powell, University of Cape Town |
497 |
| 20. | The Rights of the State, and the State of Rights in State Information Technology Agency v Gijima Holdings (Pty) Limited Robert Hlati Freeman, University of Oxford |
521 |
| 21. | Breaking the Silence: The Treatment of Ius Cogens in Zimbabwe Torture Docket and Al Bashir Mia Swart, HSRC |
537 |
Vol VIII
| Elections | ||
| 1. | Liable Lies Nicholas Stephanopoulos |
1 |
| 2. | Autonomy, Fairness, Pragmatism, and False Electoral Speech: An Analysis of Democratic Alliance v African National Congress Geo Quinot & P J H Maree |
23 |
| 3. | My Vote Counts: The Basis and Limits of a Constitutional Requirement of Political Disclosure Graeme Orr |
52 |
| 4. | My Vote Counts, International Standards and Transparency of Political Party Funding: Does the State Have a Duty to Provide for Continuous and Systematic Disclosure? Joo-Cheong Tham |
74 |
| 5. | Don’t Blame the Librarian if No One Has Written the Book:’ My Vote Counts and the Information Required to Exercise the Franchise Toerien van Wyk |
97 |
| The Public Protector | ||
| 6. | A Politics of Accountability: How South Africa’s Judicial Recognition of the Binding Legal Effect of the Public Protector’s Recommendations Had a Catalysing Effect that Brought Down a President Stu Woolman |
155 |
| 7. | ‘Coercing Virtue’ in the Constitutional Court: Neutral Principles, Rationality and the Nkandla Problem Michael Tsele |
193 |
| Commissions and Legal Aid | ||
| 8. | Reconceiving Commissions of Inquiry as Plural and Participatory Institutions: A Critical Reflection on Magidiwana Grant Hoole |
221 |
| 9. | The Right to Civil Legal Aid in South Africa: Legal Aid South Africa v Magidiwana Magidiwana Jason Brickhill & Christine Grobler |
256 |
| Gender and the Judiciary | ||
| 10. | Ms. Elsie Klaase and the Constitutional Court’s Missing Women Mateenah Hunter & Tim Fish Hodgson |
283 |
| 11. | Twenty-Three Years of Gender Transformation in the Constitutional Court of South Africa: Progress or Regression Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko & Sibusiso Blessing Radebe |
306 |
| Case Comment | ||
| 12. | South African Reserve Bank v Shuttleworth: A Constitutional Lawyer’s Nightmare Cora Hoexter |
333 |
Vol VII
| Administrative Law | ||
| 1. | Good Reviews, Bad Actors: The Constitutional Court’s Procedural Drama Leo Boonzaier |
1 |
| 2. | The Puzzle of Pronouncing on the Validity of Administrative Action on Review Geo Quinot & P J H Maree |
27 |
| 3. | The Ebb and Flow of the Application of the Principle of Subsidiarity – Critical Reflections on Motau and My Vote Counts Melanie Murcott & Werner van der Westhuizen |
43 |
| 4. | Administrative Action, the Principle of Legality and Deference – The Case of Minister of Defence and Military Veterans v Motau Andrew Konstant |
68 |
| 5. | The Test for ‘Exceptional Circumstances’ Where an Order of Substitution is Sought: An Analysis of Trencon Against the Backdrop of the Separation of Powers Lauren Kohn |
91 |
| 6. | Clarifying the Exceptional Circumstances Test in Trencon: An Opportunity Missed Raisa Cachalia |
115 |
| Affirmative Action | ||
| 7. | Dignity and Equality in Barnard Samantha Vice |
135 |
| 8. | Affirmative Action and Intensity of Review: South African Police Service v Solidarity obo Barnard Chris McConnachie |
163 |
| The Zimbabwe Torture Docket Case | ||
| 9. | South Africa’s Competing Obligations in Relation to International Crimes Lilian Chenwi & Franziska Sucker |
199 |
| 10. | Neither Complimentary nor Complementary: National Commissioner of the South African Police Service v Southern African Litigation Centre and Another Salim A Nakhjavani |
247 |
| Articles | ||
| 11. | Constitutional Heedlessness and Over-Excitement in the Common Law of Delict’s Development Emile Zitzke |
259 |
| 12. | Against the Interests of Justice: Ignoring Distributive Justice When Certifying Class Actions Khomotso Moshikaro |
291 |
| Case Comment | ||
| 13. | No Place for the Poor: The Governance of Removal in Zulu and SAITF Irene de Vos & Dennis Webster |
321 |
Vol VI
| Local Government | ||
| 1. | Confronting the State of Local Government: The 2013 Constitutional Court Decisions Jaap de Visser and Nico Steytler |
1 |
| 2. | Britannia Beach and Lagoonbay: The Constitutional Court in Muddy Waters? Some Comparative Reflections on the Benefits of an Active Judiciary Henk Kummeling |
24 |
| 3. | Adding Injury to Insult: Intrusive Laws on Top of a Weak System Phindile Ntliziywana |
32 |
| 4. | Playing With Power: The Competing Competencies of Provincial and Local Government David Borgström and Uday Kiran Naidoo |
57 |
| Customary Law | ||
| 5. | Transformative Constitutionalism and Customary Law Aninka Claassens and Geoff Budlender |
75 |
| 6. | Tradition and Modernity: Adjudicating a Constitutional Paradox Kate O’Regan |
105 |
| 7. | The Exceptionalism and Identity of Customary Law under the Constitution Wilmien Wicomb |
127 |
| 8. | Living Customary Law: A Truly Transformative Tool? Rita Ozoemena |
147 |
| Education | ||
| 9. | Procedure or Principle: The Role of Adjudication in Achieving the Right to Education Sandra Fredman |
165 |
| 10. | Executive Heavy Handedness and the Right to Basic Education 199 A reply to Sandra Fredman Yana van Leeve |
199 |
| Case Comments | ||
| 11. | Domestic Enforcement of International Judicial Decisions against Foreign States in South Africa: Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v Fick Hannah Woolaver |
217 |
| 12. | Search and Seizure without Warrant Alistair Price |
245 |
| 13. | AllPay Remedy: Dissecting the Constitutional Court’s Approach to Organs of State Meghan Finn |
258 |
| 14. | Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Another v Masingili and Others Anél du Toit |
273 |
| 15. | A False Start in the Development of Class Action Law? Mukaddam and Others v Pioneer Food (Pty) Ltd and Others Georgina Jephson |
286 |
Vol V
| Symposium 1: Constitutional Courts as Hedges against Democratic Authoritarianism | ||
| 1. | Lead Essay: Samuel Issacharoff: (New York University): The Democratic Risk to Democratic Transitions | 1 |
| 2. | Reply: Theunis Roux (University of New South Wales): The South African Constitutional Court’s Democratic Rights Jurisprudence |
33 |
| 3. | Reply: Martin Krygier (University of New South Wales): What About the Rule of Law? | 74 |
| Articles | ||
| 4. | Dikgang Moseneke (Deputy Chief Justice, Constitutional Court): Courage of Principle | 91 |
| 5. | Anton Fagan (University of Cape Town): Causation in the Constitutional Court: Lee v Minister of Correctional Services | 104 |
| 6. | Stu Woolman (University of the Witwatersrand) & Brahm Fleisch (University of the Witwatersrand): The Problem of the ‘Other’ Language | 135 |
| Symposium 2: Socio-Economic Rights: Competing Models of Constitutional Review | ||
| 7. | Lead Essay: Brian Ray (Cleveland Marshall College of Law): Evictions, Aspirations and Avoidance | 173 |
| 8. | Reply: Katharine Young (Boston College): The Avoidance of Substance in Constitutional Rights | 223 |
| 9. | Reply: David Landau (Florida State University): Aggressive Weak-Form Remedies | 244 |
| 10. | Reply: Jackie Dugard (University of the Witwatersrand): Beyond Blue Moonlight: The Implications of Judicial Avoidance in Relation to the Provision of Alternative Housing | 265 |
| 11. | Reply: Stuart Wilson (Socio-Economic Rights Institute): Curing the Poor: State Housing Policy in Johannesburg after Blue Moonlight |
280 |
| 12. | Reply: David Bilchitz (University of Johannesburg): Avoidance Remains Avoidance: Is It Desirable in Socio-Economic Rights Cases? |
297 |
| Comments and Replies | ||
| 13. | Comment: James Fowkes (Yale University): Managerial Adjudication, Constitutional Civil Procedure and Maphango v Aengus Lifestyle Properties | 309 |
| 14. | Reply: Michael Dafel (South African Institute for Advanced Constitutional, Public, Human Rights and International Law): On the Flexible Procedure of Housing Eviction Applications |
331 |
| 15. | Comment: Mia Swart (University of Johannesburg) & Thomas Coggin (University of the Witwatersrand): The Road Not Taken: Separation of Powers, Interim Interdicts, Rationality Review and E-Tolling in National Treasury v Opposition to Urban Tolling |
346 |
| 16. | Reply: Ngwako Raboshakga (Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs): The Separation of Powers in Interim Interdict Applications |
366 |
| Symposium 3: Constitutional Courts as Hedges against Democratic Authoritarianism | ||
| 17. | Vanessa Barolsky (Human Sciences Research Council): Glenister at the Coalface: Are the Police Part of an Effective Independent Security Service? | 377 |
| 18. | Bonita Meyersfeld (University of the Witwatersrand): Domesticating International Standards:The Direction of International Human Rights Law in South Africa</td> |
399 |
| 19. | Franziska Sucker (University of the Witwatersrand): Approval of an International Treaty in Parliament: How Does Section 231(2) ‘Bind the Republic’? | 417 |
| 20. | Juha Tuovinen (European University Institute): What to Do with International Law? 3 Flaws in Glenister | 435 |
| Comments | ||
| 21. | Comment: Karthy Govender (University of Kwa-Zulu Natal): The Risk of Taking Risky Decisions: Democratic Alliance v President of the Republic of South | 451 |
| 22. | Comment: Okyerebea Ampofo-Anti (Webber Wentzel) & Ben Winks (Webber Wentzel): There and Back Again: The Long Road to Access to Information in M&G Media v President of the Republic of South Africa | 466 |
Vol IV
| Articles | ||
| 1. | Rosalind Dixon & Tom Ginsburg (Chicago): The South African Constitutional Court and Socio-Economic Rights as ‘Insurance Swaps’ | 1 |
| 2. |
Christian Courtis (United Nations): Rationality, Reasonableness, Proportionality: Testing the Use of Standards of Scrutiny in the Constitutional Review of Legislation |
31 |
| Comments | ||
| 3. |
Wessel le Roux (Western Cape): The Democratic Turn and (the Limits of) Constitutional Patriotism after the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Albutt v CSVR |
51 |
| 4. | Douglas Mailula (UNISA): Customary (Communal) Land Tenure in South Africa: Did Tongoane Overlook or Avoid the Core Issue | 73 |
| Article | ||
| 5. | Stewart Motha (London): Rationality, the Rule of Law, and the Sovereign Return | 113 |
| Comment | ||
| 6. | Mkhululi D Stubbs (Johannesburg Bar): Three-level Games: Thoughts on Glenister, Scaw and International Law | 137 |
| Article | ||
| 7. | Francois Venter (Free State): Confusing Grace with Amnesia: Reviewing Acts of the Head of State |
167 |
Vol III
Vol II
Vol I
