Volume II 2009

Vol VII

Administrative Law
1.	Good Reviews, Bad Actors: The Constitutional Court’s Procedural Drama Leo Boonzaier	1
2.	The Puzzle of Pronouncing on the Validity of Administrative Action on Review Geo Quinot & P J H Maree	27
3.	The Ebb and Flow of the Application of the Principle of Subsidiarity – Critical Reflections on Motau and My Vote Counts Melanie Murcott & Werner van der Westhuizen	43
4.	Administrative Action, the Principle of Legality and Deference – The Case of Minister of Defence and Military Veterans v Motau Andrew Konstant	68
5.	The Test for ‘Exceptional Circumstances’ Where an Order of Substitution is Sought: An Analysis of Trencon Against the Backdrop of the Separation of Powers Lauren Kohn	91
6.	Clarifying the Exceptional Circumstances Test in Trencon: An Opportunity Missed Raisa Cachalia	115
Affirmative Action
7.	Dignity and Equality in Barnard Samantha Vice	135
8.	Affirmative Action and Intensity of Review: South African Police Service v Solidarity obo Barnard Chris McConnachie	163
The Zimbabwe Torture Docket Case
9.	South Africa’s Competing Obligations in Relation to International Crimes Lilian Chenwi & Franziska Sucker	199
10.	Neither Complimentary nor Complementary: National Commissioner of the South African Police Service v Southern African Litigation Centre and Another Salim A Nakhjavani	247
Articles
11.	Constitutional Heedlessness and Over-Excitement in the Common Law of Delict’s Development Emile Zitzke	259
12.	Against the Interests of Justice: Ignoring Distributive Justice When Certifying Class Actions Khomotso Moshikaro	291
Case Comment
13.	No Place for the Poor: The Governance of Removal in Zulu and SAITF Irene de Vos & Dennis Webster	321

 

Vol VI

Vol V

Symposium 1: Constitutional Courts as Hedges against Democratic Authoritarianism
1.	Lead Essay: Samuel Issacharoff: (New York University): The Democratic Risk to Democratic Transitions	1
2.	Reply: Theunis Roux (University of New South Wales): The South African Constitutional Court’s Democratic Rights Jurisprudence	33
3.	Reply: Martin Krygier (University of New South Wales): What About the Rule of Law?	74
Articles
4.	Dikgang Moseneke (Deputy Chief Justice, Constitutional Court): Courage of Principle	91
5.	Anton Fagan (University of Cape Town): Causation in the Constitutional Court: Lee v Minister of Correctional Services	104
6.	Stu Woolman (University of the Witwatersrand) & Brahm Fleisch (University of the Witwatersrand): The Problem of the ‘Other’ Language	135
Symposium 2: Socio-Economic Rights: Competing Models of Constitutional Review
7.	Lead Essay: Brian Ray (Cleveland Marshall College of Law): Evictions, Aspirations and Avoidance	173
8.	Reply: Katharine Young (Boston College): The Avoidance of Substance in Constitutional Rights	223
9.	Reply: David Landau (Florida State University): Aggressive Weak-Form Remedies	244
10.	Reply: Jackie Dugard (University of the Witwatersrand): Beyond Blue Moonlight: The Implications of Judicial Avoidance in Relation to the Provision of Alternative Housing	265
11.	Reply: Stuart Wilson (Socio-Economic Rights Institute): Curing the Poor: State Housing Policy in Johannesburg after Blue Moonlight	280
12.	Reply: David Bilchitz (University of Johannesburg): Avoidance Remains Avoidance: Is It Desirable in Socio-Economic Rights Cases?	297
Comments and Replies
13.	Comment: James Fowkes (Yale University): Managerial Adjudication, Constitutional Civil Procedure and Maphango v Aengus Lifestyle Properties	309
14.	Reply: Michael Dafel (South African Institute for Advanced Constitutional, Public, Human Rights and International Law): On the Flexible Procedure of Housing Eviction Applications	331
15.	Comment: Mia Swart (University of Johannesburg) & Thomas Coggin (University of the Witwatersrand): The Road Not Taken: Separation of Powers, Interim Interdicts, Rationality Review and E-Tolling in National Treasury v Opposition to Urban Tolling	346
16.	Reply: Ngwako Raboshakga (Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs): The Separation of Powers in Interim Interdict Applications	366
Symposium 3: Constitutional Courts as Hedges against Democratic Authoritarianism
17.	Vanessa Barolsky (Human Sciences Research Council): Glenister at the Coalface: Are the Police Part of an Effective Independent Security Service?	377
18.	Bonita Meyersfeld (University of the Witwatersrand): Domesticating International Standards:The Direction of International Human Rights Law in South Africa</td>	399
19.	Franziska Sucker (University of the Witwatersrand): Approval of an International Treaty in Parliament: How Does Section 231(2) ‘Bind the Republic’?	417
20.	Juha Tuovinen (European University Institute): What to Do with International Law? 3 Flaws in Glenister	435
Comments
21.	Comment: Karthy Govender (University of Kwa-Zulu Natal): The Risk of Taking Risky Decisions: Democratic Alliance v President of the Republic of South	451
22.	Comment: Okyerebea Ampofo-Anti (Webber Wentzel) & Ben Winks (Webber Wentzel): There and Back Again: The Long Road to Access to Information in M&G Media v President of the Republic of South Africa	466

 

Vol IV

Vol III

Vol II

Vol I