Constitutional Court Review

Elections
1.	Liable Lies Nicholas Stephanopoulos	1
2.	Autonomy, Fairness, Pragmatism, and False Electoral Speech: An Analysis of Democratic Alliance v African National Congress Geo Quinot & P J H Maree	23
3.	My Vote Counts: The Basis and Limits of a Constitutional Requirement of Political Disclosure Graeme Orr	52
4.	My Vote Counts, International Standards and Transparency of Political Party Funding: Does the State Have a Duty to Provide for Continuous and Systematic Disclosure? Joo-Cheong Tham	74
5.	Don’t Blame the Librarian if No One Has Written the Book:’ My Vote Counts and the Information Required to Exercise the Franchise Toerien van Wyk	97
The Public Protector
6.	A Politics of Accountability: How South Africa’s Judicial Recognition of the Binding Legal Effect of the Public Protector’s Recommendations Had a Catalysing Effect that Brought Down a President Stu Woolman	155
7.	‘Coercing Virtue’ in the Constitutional Court: Neutral Principles, Rationality and the Nkandla Problem Michael Tsele	193
Commissions and Legal Aid
8.	Reconceiving Commissions of Inquiry as Plural and Participatory Institutions: A Critical Reflection on Magidiwana Grant Hoole	221
9.	The Right to Civil Legal Aid in South Africa: Legal Aid South Africa v Magidiwana Magidiwana Jason Brickhill & Christine Grobler	256
Gender and the Judiciary
10.	Ms. Elsie Klaase and the Constitutional Court’s Missing Women Mateenah Hunter & Tim Fish Hodgson	283
11.	Twenty-Three Years of Gender Transformation in the Constitutional Court of South Africa: Progress or Regression Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko & Sibusiso Blessing Radebe	306
Case Comment
12.	South African Reserve Bank v Shuttleworth: A Constitutional Lawyer’s Nightmare Cora Hoexter	333

About CCR

The Constitutional Court Review is the only international journal of record that devotes its attention to the work of South Africa’s highest court. The long essays, replies, articles and case comments use recent decisions to navigate more general currents in the Court’s jurisprudence. The authors may be first rate black letter lawyers, but their interventions are about what South African constitutional law ought to be, not what it is. The Journal follows a strict double-blind, peer-reviewed editorial process. It both solicits work from outstanding scholars and accepts submissions that warrant inclusion. The Editors engage with their authors from start to finish and follow internationally accepted best practices. The Constitutional Court Review has been fortunate to have several steadfast sponsors: the University of the Witwatersrand, the University of Johannesburg, the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, SAIFAC, Juta Law and Constitutional Law of South Africa. For any inquiries please contact the Editor-in-Chief, Professor Stu Woolman, at stuart.woolman@wits.ac.za. We look forward to your responses to our work.

Editor’s Note

Chips all in. If you can find a better single volume on South African constitutional law in any South African law journal, then I will buy you a bottle of your favourite scotch. I’m not playing with house money. Read more